Former England skipper Ray Wilkins has told Sky Sports News HQ he does not
expect Ronald Koeman to leave Southampton for Everton this summer.
Adidas Nmd
r1 Primeknit Shoes . The ex-Chelsea and Manchester United star
believes the new contracts handed to three Saints players in recent days may be
a tell-tale sign that their Dutch manager is also staying on the south
coast.Koeman is being linked to the vacant seat at Everton, who sacked Roberto
Martinez on Thursday following their dismal end to the Premier League season.
However, the news that Fraser Forster, James Ward-Prowse and Virgil van Dijk are
remaining at St Marys may be down to a guarantee that Koeman will still be
Southampton boss next season.Goalkeeper Forster has signed a new five-year deal,
while midfielder Ward-Prowse and defender van Dijk are staying for six more
seasons.Wilkins said: Forster is an England international, and young Ward-Prowse
has done well for the under 21s. He may be looking for a bigger fish, and thats
no disrespect to Everton or their supporters. Ray Wilkins Would they have sought
guarantees from Koeman that he was going to remain there before signing their
contracts?Both have improved under him and, in the modern day game, they may
have wanted assurances he was staying.And Wilkins believes Koeman may not view
Everton as being a step up from Southampton, bearing in mind that the Toffees
trail Saints by 16 points going into the final weekend of the season.He added: I
think Southampton are the bigger club. He may be looking for a bigger fish, and
thats no disrespect to Everton or their supporters. Ray Wilkins believes
Southampton boss Ronald Koeman will stay at the club this summer despite reports
linking him with Everton. Hes done a magnificent job. When he went there (in
June 2014) they had just sold about five players - three went to Liverpool - and
he has had to rebuild all over again.He sells players but brings in top quality
players who are accustomed to our league. I think hes ready for a go at the top
four.Wilkins thinks the demise of Martinez maybe down to the teams failures when
their opponents have possession.He went on: What Ive seen of Everton the last
couple of years, with the ball they are exceptional, reaching two cup
semi-finals this year, so its not all bad.With the ball good but without it not
so good - or not as good as it should be. I think that has been their major
failing.Its all about winning, and when you lose eight games at home, thats not
good enough if youre a top club. Also See: Martinez sacked Next Everton boss
Saints sign new deals Van Dijk commits
Buy Adidas
Nmd r1 Online .J. -- New York Giants wide receiver Victor Cruz will
miss the rest of the season after having surgery on his left knee.
Adidas Nmd
r1 Primeknit Australia . PAUL, Minn.
http://www.nmdadidasshoesaustralia.com/ .
LOUIS -- St.Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements
or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at
cmonref@tsn.ca! Hey Kerry, In last nights Kings vs. Sharks game, the Kings
appeared to have scored a goal shortly after the Sharks made it 2-0 on a power
play. The goal was called back because the ref blew the play dead on a premature
whistle. The puck never stopped moving and yet it was blown dead. Its obvious
the ref would never admit he blew it early and it was a good goal. My question
to you is, what can be done to rectify situations like this? Also - during
playoffs, when officials make mistakes like this, do they lose the chance to
officiate an upcoming game. I understand the game is played at a quick tempo and
these guys are doing the best they can and mistakes are made. Im just curious as
to what the repercussions are for officials. We all know what they are for
players, as the league makes it known. Thanks,Rob KitzanSaskatoon Rob: The
reason this goal was negated is because of something referred to as the Referees
intent to blow the whistle to stop play. Simply put, that means that once the
Ref determines (in his mind) that the puck is frozen or unplayable it is a dead
play in that moment irrespective of any delayed time response to physically blow
the whistle. This is referenced in the following rules: 31.2 Disputes - As there
is a human factor involved in blowing the whistle to stop play, the Referee may
deem the play to be stopped slightly prior to the whistle actually being blown.
The fact that the puck may come loose or cross the goal line prior to the sound
of the whistle has no bearing if the Referee has ruled that the play had been
stopped prior to this happening. 78.5 (xii) Disallowed Goals - When the Referee
deems the play has been stopped, even if he had not physically had the
opportunity to stop play by blowing his whistle. 85.3 Puck Out of Sight - Should
a scramble take place or a player accidentally fall on the puck and the puck be
out of sight of the Referee, he shall immediately blow his whistle to stop play.
As the puck was shot into Antti Niemi with Dustin Penner hovering at the crease
along with Kings defensive traffic , Referee Brad Meier determined (in his mind)
that the puck was sufficiently frozen and as a result was in the act of blowing
his whistle..
Adidas Nmd r1 Australia. With Meiers physical
action to blow the whistle taking place, the puck continued on its slide path
between Niemis pads and became exposed. Whether Dustin Penner nudged the puck
over the goal line or if it travelled there under its own steam is of no
consequence; nor is the sound of the Referees whistle being heard just after the
puck crossed the goal line. All that is of consequence on is this play is that
the Referee deemed the play stopped prior to blowing his whistle as outlined in
the above rule references. In hindsight the Referees decision to stop play was
premature. A "quick whistle" resulted in a good goal being disallowed. Referee
Meier would likely be the first guy to tell you so along with how sick it made
him feel once he saw a replay. While this is of no consolation to the LA Kings
or their fans the Referee didnt have the benefit of a replay or hindsight. He
had to make a split second decision at the time. It proved to be the wrong one.
So Rob, how can this situation be avoided and/or rectified in the future? You
can bet that the Referee, along with the others presently working in the
playoffs, will be more patient in determining a frozen puck and their intent to
blow the whistle. The other corrective measure should take place over the summer
and allow for video review to take place on a play such as this, in addition to
all cases where goalkeeper interference is suspected. Since the overriding
factor is the moment the Ref determines the play to be dead (in his mind) no one
else could review the play to overturn this thought process. This must be done
exclusively by the Referee himself. Any inner thoughts he might have had in the
nanosecond would most likely be clearly illuminated once he saw the replay to
render the correct decision. I maintain the same is true with goalkeeper
interference. Give that call back to the Referee(s) on the ice through video
review; whether through a Coaches challenge or just vest the Referee with the
authority to review the goal at ice level. As far as repercussions of calls to
the Officials, all performances are evaluated and decisions are made as to who
moves on to the next round. Previously assigned games would not likely be
changed since Referees move from one series to another. This was a human error
made by a very honest and good Referee.
Wholesale China Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Authentic Jerseys
Nike NFL Jerseys China Wholesale Nike Basketball
Jerseys Hockey Jerseys
China Supply Baseball
Jerseys Football Jerseys
Sale Authentic College
Jerseys MLB Jerseys China Stitched Soccer Jerseys Cheap Jerseys From China Cheap Nike Jerseys ' ' '
The Wall